Who we work with...

Why the Arm’s Length Principle Matters

Applying the arm’s length principle ensures fair taxation and credible financial results. It protects multinational groups from double taxation, builds regulator confidence, and provides a consistent standard for pricing intercompany goods, services, and IP across borders. It also strengthens investor trust through transparent and defensible pricing.

Arm’s Length Principle For CFOs

For CFOs, consistent application of the arm’s length principle ensures predictable tax outcomes and cleaner audits. It provides a clear pricing framework that links profits to operational value. CFOs gain improved control over margins and compliance, reducing adjustment risk while maintaining stability in group-wide financial reporting.

Arm’s Length Principle For Tax Managers

For Tax Managers, the arm’s length principle is the foundation of compliance. It guides benchmarking studies, comparability assessments, and documentation standards. Ensuring each transaction reflects market behavior supports accurate tax filings and a strong defense during transfer pricing audits or disputes with local authorities.

Arm’s Length Principle For CEOs
For CEOs, adherence to the arm’s length principle signals integrity and sustainable governance. It ensures that the business operates transparently across jurisdictions, preventing reputational risk and demonstrating responsible tax practices that align with long-term corporate strategy and investor expectations.

Arm’s Length Principle For CEOs

Arm’s Length Principle OECD Guidelines Reference

The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) position the arm’s length principle as the core standard for global transfer pricing. It requires that related entities price transactions as independent parties would, ensuring profits follow value creation and global tax consistency.

Common Arm’s Length Principle Mistakes

Even established multinational groups can misapply the arm’s length principle. Errors often arise from poor benchmarking or fragmented documentation, leading to profit misalignment and increased audit exposure. Addressing these early ensures compliance, transparency, and financial stability.

Using Outdated Comparables

Failing to refresh benchmarking studies each year causes pricing gaps between intercompany rates and market data. This creates exposure to costly tax adjustments, penalties, and double taxation. Regularly updating comparables ensures that transfer prices remain defensible, current, and aligned with economic conditions across jurisdictions.

Ignoring Functional Differences

Applying third-party comparables without adjusting for differences in assets, functions, or risk levels leads to unreliable pricing outcomes. This weakens audit defense and misrepresents real value creation. A robust functional analysis must always accompany benchmarking to ensure transactions truly reflect arm’s length behavior.

Assuming one global pricing approach fits all ignores the variations in local tax laws and documentation rules. Each jurisdiction interprets the OECD principle differently, requiring tailored adjustments. Failure to localize analysis can invalidate reports and trigger tax authority challenges or profit reallocations.

Overlooking Local Regulations

Using inconsistent intercompany pricing policies across subsidiaries signals weak governance and control. Inconsistent margins or transfer prices draw scrutiny from regulators. A globally unified approach with clear documentation ensures alignment, credibility, and fairness across all entities in the group.

Inconsistent Policy Application

Neglecting DEMPE Considerations

Failing to account for who develops, enhances, maintains, protects, and exploits intangibles breaks the link between value creation and reward. Ignoring DEMPE functions can cause income misallocation, increasing audit risk and undermining compliance with OECD arm’s length standards across jurisdictions.

Preparing reports after year-end rather than during the financial period weakens audit defense. Real-time documentation shows that transfer prices were set with intent and accuracy. Keeping reports current ensures transparency, consistency, and alignment with OECD expectations for compliance.

Neglecting Documentation Updates