New empty page | iVC Consulting

Transfer Pricing Definition

Transfer pricing sets how related entities price intercompany goods, services, or IP. The goal is to match what independent parties would charge, ensuring compliance with the OECD’s arm’s-length principle and minimizing tax risk.

Create it

Who we work with

Why Transfer Pricing Matters

Accurate transfer pricing protects profit margins and avoids double taxation. It builds regulator and investor trust while giving CFOs clear control over global finance operations and predictable tax outcomes.

Transfer Pricing For CFOs

Transfer pricing enables financial predictability. It ensures profits align with value creation, supporting audit-ready accounts and stable effective tax rates. A robust framework gives CFOs control over margins, cash flow, and investor confidence

Transfer Pricing For Tax Managers

It provides a roadmap for compliance. A clear policy framework, supported by local files and benchmarking, reduces adjustment risks and streamlines data collection. With transparent documentation, Tax Managers defend positions confidently in audits

Transfer pricing secures global reputation and growth. It signals to investors and regulators that governance is strong and risks are managed. CEOs use it to show that the organisation’s expansion model is scalable, compliant, and future-proof.

Transfer Pricing For CEOs

Tranfer Pricing OECD Guidelines Reference

The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) outline the principles for pricing intercompany transactions among multinational groups. The framework standardises documentation - Master File, Local File, and Country-by-Country Report - ensuring global alignment and transparency.

Common Transfer Pricing Mistakes

Even well-structured multinational groups can fall into recurring transfer pricing pitfalls. These mistakes often arise from outdated data, reactive compliance habits, or weak coordination between functions. Addressing them early protects profits, compliance, and credibility.

Year-End Compliance Focus

Treating transfer pricing as a year-end task causes rushed filings, poor data quality, and higher audit exposure. Continuous monitoring ensures accurate margins, cleaner audits, and stronger financial control across all entities.

Ignoring Functional and DEMPE Analysis

Skipping functional and DEMPE analysis in IP-heavy models breaks the link between value creation and reward. Mapping who develops, enhances, maintains, protects, and exploits IP keeps your structure defensible and OECD-compliant.

Relying on outdated benchmarking data leads to distorted margins and unreliable documentation. Refreshing comparables annually keeps your analysis aligned with current market conditions and avoids unnecessary tax adjustments.

Using Outdated Comparables

Reusing global templates without adapting to local rules invites compliance gaps. Each jurisdiction interprets OECD guidance differently - tailoring reports ensures relevance, accuracy, and credibility with local tax authorities.

Year-End Compliance Focus

Poor Cross-Functional Alignment

When tax, finance, and legal teams work in silos, inconsistencies emerge across filings and reports. Early collaboration creates a unified narrative, protects audit integrity, and strengthens confidence with regulators and investors.

Failing to update transfer pricing documentation after business changes - like restructurings, funding rounds, or new markets - creates data mismatches and audit exposure. Regular refreshes ensure every file reflects your current value chain and governance reality.