Who we work with...

Why is the CUP Method useful?

The CUP Method is highly useful because it provides the most accurate and direct measure of whether intercompany pricing aligns with open-market conditions. By referencing real transactions between independent parties, CUP allows tax teams to verify compliance with the OECD’s arm’s length principle. It builds credibility with regulators, strengthens audit defense, and ensures profits are reported where real economic activity occurs. When comparable data is available and carefully adjusted, CUP offers unparalleled precision and transparency in demonstrating fair global transfer pricing outcomes.

CUP Method For CFOs

For CFOs, the CUP Method delivers confidence that group pricing policies withstand audit scrutiny. It provides visibility into whether margins reflect real market conditions, ensuring predictable tax outcomes and financial transparency across jurisdictions.

Cup Method For Tax Managers

For Tax Managers, CUP is the gold standard for accuracy. It uses direct market comparisons to validate transfer prices, reducing the need for subjective assumptions. When applied with reliable data, it simplifies compliance, strengthens documentation, and improves audit defense under OECD and local tax standards.

For CEOs, applying the CUP Method demonstrates that the company’s transfer pricing framework is grounded in integrity and fair market behavior. It signals robust governance and reinforces the organization’s credibility with regulators, investors, and international tax authorities.

CUP Method For CEOs

CUP Method OECD Guidelines Reference

The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) position the CUP Method as the most direct way to test the arm’s length principle. Chapter II explains that CUP compares the price in a controlled transaction to that in a comparable uncontrolled transaction—whether internal or external. Reliable application depends on accurate functional analysis, comparable data, and documented adjustments for material differences. Properly executed, CUP provides strong, transparent evidence that transfer prices reflect independent market conditions and support fair global profit allocation.

Key Benefits of the CUP Method

The CUP Method provides measurable benefits for multinational enterprises seeking transparency, consistency, and defensibility in transfer pricing. When applied correctly, it enhances compliance, reduces disputes, and reinforces a company’s global tax framework's credibility.

Direct Market Validation

The CUP Method provides the strongest link between intercompany prices and independent market data. It enables tax teams to confirm that related-party transactions mirror real-world conditions, giving regulators confidence that prices are transparent, defensible, and OECD-compliant.

Enhanced Audit Defensibility

By relying on objective market benchmarks, CUP creates a clear audit trail that is easily verifiable by tax authorities. Its transparency and reliance on external comparables reduce dispute risk and strengthen confidence in a company’s global transfer pricing position.

CUP ensures that profits are allocated to the entities performing real economic functions and managing key risks. This alignment supports sustainable compliance, reinforces integrity in reporting, and ensures that tax outcomes reflect genuine value creation across jurisdictions.

Alignment With Economic Substance

CUP ensures that profits are allocated to the entities performing real economic functions and managing key risks. This alignment supports sustainable compliance, reinforces integrity in reporting, and ensures that tax outcomes reflect genuine value creation across jurisdictions.

Global Consistency and Transparency

Supports OECD and BEPS Compliance

CUP directly aligns with OECD and BEPS Action 13 requirements by providing transparent, data-driven documentation. Its precision strengthens local and global reporting integrity, allowing authorities to trace pricing logic and verify compliance efficiently.

Using CUP fosters better internal decision-making through centralized access to market data and comparability analyses. It supports continuous improvement in pricing policies, enabling finance and tax teams to maintain real-time accuracy and strategic oversight.

Improved Decision-Making and Data Integrity

CUP Method in the Real World

A Hong Kong–based trading subsidiary sells copper rods to its German parent company for $7,950 per metric ton. Independent market data from the London Metal Exchange (LME) shows comparable copper rods with identical purity and delivery terms sold between unrelated parties for $8,000 per metric ton. After adjusting for freight and insurance costs of $25 per ton, the adjusted arm’s length price is $7,975 per metric ton.

Because the controlled transaction price of $7,950 falls within the adjusted market range, the CUP analysis confirms compliance with the OECD’s arm’s length principle. This demonstrates that the related-party transaction aligns with prevailing market conditions and provides robust support for audit defense under BEPS documentation requirements.

Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method FAQ

What is the CUP Method used for?

The CUP Method is used to determine whether the price charged between related parties matches the price that would be charged between independent enterprises in comparable circumstances. It ensures that transfer prices reflect real market conditions and comply with the OECD arm’s length principle, supporting transparent global taxation.

When should the CUP Method be applied?

The CUP Method should be applied when comparable uncontrolled transactions exist that provide reliable market references. It is most effective for standardized goods, commodities, or financial transactions where external data is available. Proper adjustments for quality, volume, or contract terms maintain accuracy and OECD compliance.

How does the CUP Method differ from TNMM?

The CUP Method directly compares transaction prices, while the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) evaluates profitability indicators like margins or returns. CUP is more precise but requires high-quality comparable data. TNMM is broader and often applied when no direct price comparables are available under OECD standards.